C ControlGS
SIGGRAPH ASIA 2026 / RESEARCH PROJECT

ControlGSConditioning Neural Gaussians for
Downstream-Processing–Aware XR Rendering

Optimize the image that reaches the eye.

Weikai Lin1Junjie Zhao1Carl Marshall2Sushant Kondguli2Yuhao Zhu1

1 University of Rochester2 Reality Labs, Meta

ControlGS in actionPROJECT TEASER · SOUND AVAILABLE
From Gaussian primitives to the post-optics image.Download video ↓
3conditioned processing stages
20resolution–power evaluation settings
2benchmark datasets
End-to-endquality measured after the optics

01 / OVERVIEW

Rendering doesn’t end
at the framebuffer.

Lens correction, resampling, display mapping, and physical optics all change what an XR user sees. ControlGS brings that path into the training objective.

THE FULL PICTURE ControlGS conditions Gaussian generation on downstream processing parameters. Click any figure to enlarge. ↗

Abstract

02 / METHOD

One scene.
Conditions that adapt.

Learn a condition-injection module for a neural Gaussian decoder, then adjust its injection strength to match the downstream state at render time.

CONTROLGS ARCHITECTURE End-to-end supervision through the post-processing and display-optics path. ↗
01

Lens correction

Condition on each feature’s projected screen-space location to account for spatially varying optical aberrations.

Spatially aware
02

Anti-aliasing resampling

Adjust the condition strength with the effective display sampling rate as the viewing state changes.

Resolution aware
03

Display mapping

Condition Gaussian decoding on the display power target to improve quality under a power constraint.

Power aware

03 / RESULTS

Better images.
After the entire pipeline.

Evaluation on Mip-NeRF 360 and NeRF Synthetic, averaged across scenes and 20 resolution–power settings. The results below use the Scaffold-GS backbone.

ControlGS vs. SS-Scaffold-GS
PSNR ↑19.33 dB

+0.37 dB over baseline

SSIM ↑0.524

+0.028 over baseline

LPIPS ↓0.528

−0.030 below baseline

Post-optics image quality · Mip-NeRF 360
MethodPSNR ↑SSIM ↑LPIPS ↓

Values reproduced from Table 1 of the paper. Higher PSNR/SSIM and lower LPIPS are better. See the paper for the evaluation protocol, perceptual metrics, and runtime/storage trade-offs.

QUALITATIVE COMPARISON Post-optics images under different XR runtime settings. ↗
Explore how individual conditions change the rendering +
Raw rendered outputs before the downstream pipeline, varying one condition at a time.

04 / RESOURCES

Take a closer look.

Cite ControlGS

@inproceedings{lin2026controlgs,
  title = {ControlGS: Conditioning Neural Gaussians for
           Downstream-Processing--Aware XR Rendering},
  author = {Lin, Weikai and Zhao, Junjie and Marshall, Carl and
            Kondguli, Sushant and Zhu, Yuhao},
  booktitle = {SIGGRAPH Asia 2026 Conference Papers},
  year = {2026}
}