data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e4b1/6e4b184caeeda386cce11da957b3ab321ba0d6af" alt=""
(60 FPS)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89998/89998ca449e0dae842e08f0c99eda116f1a39bd4" alt=""
(12 FPS)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32b01/32b01d2fd9592514adaeb0989aeb51c6cae83787" alt=""
(121 FPS)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6aead/6aead2a4f7db689a58b76f07d12620b2078e36ea" alt=""
(13 FPS)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/42870/4287093f44fb57560abba817f067f5c6caf31e93" alt=""
(57 FPS)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2180e/2180ed8c6d573d3e6ca0d1a683808eb25bea113f" alt=""
(10 FPS)
The first row shows a comparison between the Dense Model (Mini-Splatting-D [Fang 2024]) and our method, which includes Our-L1 (Pruned Version) and FR (Foveated Rendering). We also display the L2~L4 used in FR in the second row. All videos are fixed to 90 FPS for comparison.
- Note:
Mini-D (12 FPS)
Our-L1 (60 FPS)
Our-FR (85 FPS)
Our-L2
Our-L3
Our-L4
Our Foveated Rendering. In addition to introducing Computation-Aware Pruning, we further enhance rendering efficiency by employing Multi-Versioning-based Foveated Rendering (left figure), leveraging human perceptual characteristics. A user study conducted in VR verifies the final quality. The right figure compares the Quality-FPS trade-off, measured using the objective metric PSNR and Jetson Xavier, between our method and other approaches.
The comparison between our method and Mini-Splatting-D [Fang 2024] is shown below. FPS is averaged over the test poses, measured on Jetson Xavier.